¶1(concurring specially).
¶2I concur in the result. However, I do not agree that the evidence in this case justifies the conclusion reached by the majority that there was a pretextual arrest. Rather, I would hold that evidence obtained under the “plain-view” doctrine is not admissible where the opportunity of the arresting officer to obtain the plain view was secured by an illegal arrest.
¶3Further, I would hold that under the facts of this case evidence obtained pursuant to a consent to search was the direct product of an illegal arrest and therefore inadmissible against the accused.