State v. Korth’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because this case involves more and different circumstantial evidence that, when viewed together, would allow a factfinder to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant knew the vehicle was stolen.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“However, an inferred fact 'must be one that a rational factfinder can be convinced follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the underlying facts.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“person takes, operates, exercises control over, rides in or otherwise uses another's vehicle * * * without consent of the owner.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.