State v. Valerio’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Id. That inquiry requires that we first identify in time the initial, intended crime for which the jury could have found the defendant guilty based on an ordinary accomplice theory. Id. That is because”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 294 Or. App. 754 - Drown v. Persson

2. “Based on that understanding, we have previously explained that, to determine whether the natural-and-probable-consequence instruction could have affected the jury's verdict, we must determine whether,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 294 Or. App. 754 - Drown v. Persson

3. “A person aids or abets another person in the commission of a crime if the person:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 294 Or. App. 754 - Drown v. Persson