Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 P2D 337 - Phillips v. Barker

Phillips v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1994
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1994

5 state decisions

2019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Liberty Nat. Bank of Weatherford v. Semkoff · City of Altus v. Martin · Hodgson v. Hatfield · Burks v. American Nat. Bank of Tulsa · Lyons v. Lyons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that a trial judge must, upon his own motion, instruct correctly upon the fundamental issues made up by the pleadings and the evidence, and that failure so to do is reversible error. Liberty Nat. Bank of Weatherford v. Semkoff, 184 Okl. 18 , 84 P.2d 438 ; City of Altus v. Martin, 185 Okl. 446 , 94 P.2d 1 ; Evlo Refining & Marketing Co. v. Moore, 192 Okl. 576 , 137 P.2d 911 . * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.