Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 PA 244 - Phillips v. Donaldson

Phillips v. Donaldson’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Pennsylvania Co. v. Sun Co. (1927), Price v. Anderson (1947)

49 state decisions

14019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Landell v. Hamilton · Orne v. Fridenberg · Hohl v. Modell · Prendergast v. Walls · Rhodes v. Dunbar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The difference between a public and a private nuisance does not depend upon the nature of the thing done but upon the question whether it affects the general public or merely some private individual or individuals”: Phillips v. Donaldson 269 Pa. 244 (1920).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.