269 So. 2d 16 - State v. Kircheis’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1985
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · Schmerber v. State of California · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Vale v. Louisiana · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stanisic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"With the search being lawful for the reasons stated, and therefore not violative of the fourth amendment, relevant evidence found therein would not be subject to be suppressed. Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 , 87 S.Ct. 1642 , 18 L.Ed.2d 782 . An exception thereto is that evidence so seized which is `testimonial' or `communicative' in nature, the introduction of which would amount to compelling the defendant to become a witness against himself, is subject to be suppressed because in violation of the fifth amendment." At 17.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tsavaris v. Scruggs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.