Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

269 So. 2d 379

Nuzzo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 8, 1972

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1972-11-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1981

1 state decisions

Relies on 221 So. 2d 7 - Bartz v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-11-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to each of two informations and enter pleas of not guilty thereto.

¶2Appellant proffered testimony to corroborate his allegations in the motion; however, the trial court denied the proffer and summarily denied the motion.

¶3We hold that the appellant was entitled to an evidentiary hearing in view of the allegations of his motion which were in part corroborated by the proffered evidence.1

¶4Reversed and remanded.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur. McNULTY, J., dissents.

¶5. Bartz v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 7.

/269/so2d/379 · .json · Public domain