Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

269 S.W. 1056

Gray v. State

Decided March 25, 1925

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1925-03-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1987

6 state decisions

301925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LATTIMORE, J.

¶1The application for leave to file second motion for rehearing will be denied. The only matter attempted to be raised, viz., that the trial court erred in not charging on circumstantial evidence, was discussed in the original opinion, and, when the matter was up for rehearing, it was then thought that said proposition did not present a suggestion of error on the part of the learned trial judge. Appellant testified positively to his presence at the time of the homicide,, but averred that the fatal blow was struck by Burl Kemp. All the facts and circumstances in evidence by the other state witnesses, as well as by the accomplice Kemp, made plain the proposition that, not only was appellant present, but participated in the killing and in the removal and secretion of the body, etc.

¶2The leave prayed for will be denied.

/269/sw/1056 · .json · Public domain