Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 Va. 262 - Com. v. Allen

Com. v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Addington v. Texas · Fred C. Walker Agency, Inc. v. Lucas · Noll v. Rahal · John v. Wong Shik Im · Perdieu v. Blackstone Family Practice Center, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Clear and convincing evidence has been defined as that measure or degree of proof which will produce in the mind of the trier of facts a firm belief or conviction as to the allegations sought to be established. It is intermediate, being more than a mere preponderance, but not to the extent of such certainty as is required beyond a reasonable doubt as in criminal cases. It does not mean clear and unequivocal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “any person who (i) has been convicted of a sexually violent offense... and (ii) because of a mental abnormality or personality disorder, finds it difficult to control his predatory behavior, which makes him likely to engage in sexually violent acts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “The sole purpose of permitting expert testimony is to assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence presented or to determine a fact in issue. Generally, a witness is qualified to testify as an expert when the witness possesses sufficient knowledge, skill, or experience to make the witness competent to testify as an expert on the subject matter at issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.