Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 WIS 50 - Simon v. Van De Hey

Simon v. Van De Hey’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2000

9 state decisions

40195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co. · Czerniakowski v. National Ice & Coal Co. · Schulz v. General Casualty Co. · Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Russell · Dachelet v. Home Mutual Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . the duty of a driver is not to have his car under such control as to enable him to avoid accident, but it is his duty to use ordinary care to that end. . . .” Simon v. Van de Hey (1955), 269 Wis. 50, 55 , 68 N. W. 2d 529 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.