Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Ala. App. 564 - Middleton v. State

27 Ala. App. 564 - Middleton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 1984
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 1984

16 state decisions

60193719401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Booker v. State · Vacalis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Before there can be a conviction there must be evidence sufficient to convince the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, of every material ingredient of the offense charged. Included in the ingredients of this offense is a guilty scienter, which may be inferred by the jury from the facts and circumstances surrounding the entire transaction. Vacalis v. State, 204 Ala. 345 , 86 So. 92 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.