Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Ariz. App. 134 - State v. Sutton

27 Ariz. App. 134 - State v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2006

12 state decisions

601976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · State v. Owen · State v. Tinghitella · State v. Vallejos · State v. Westbrook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every Act shall embrace but one subject and matters properly connected therewith, which subject shall be expressed in the title; but if any subject shall be embraced in an Act which shall not be expressed in the title, such Act shall be void only as to so much thereof as shall not be embraced in the title.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he elements of a crime of possession of a credit card with intent to defraud were satisfied before the actual signing of the slips which constituted the forgeries. When the defendant forged the name of Mr. Jones to the sales slips, he embarked upon separate ‘acts’ within the meaning of A.R.S. § 13-1641.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““AN ACT RELATING TO CRIMES; PRESCRIBING PENALTY FOR THEFT OF CREDIT CARD, AND AMENDING SECTION 13-1073, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.