Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Ariz. App. 564 - State v. Celaya

27 Ariz. App. 564 - State v. Celaya’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
September 1996
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 1996

16 state decisions

60197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 191 Cal. App. 2d 203 - People v. Buono · State v. Benge · State v. Hughes · State v. Mitchell · State v. Tuell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Care must be taken not to equate the overt act required by conspiracy with the overt act required in the crime of attempt. Whereas under the crime of attempt, mere preparation does not constitute an overt act, this is not true when dealing with the overt act required by conspiracy. The overt act may be merely a part of preliminary arrangements for commission of the ultimate crime. People v. Buono, 191 Cal.App.2d 203 , 12 Cal.Rptr. 604 (1961). It need amount to no more than an act showing that the conspiracy has gone beyond a mere meeting of the minds upon the attainment of an unlawful object and that action between conspirators as such has begun. [Citation omitted].””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The practical test is to eliminate the elements in one charge and determine whether the facts left would support the other charge.” 106 Ariz. at 495 , 478 P.2d at 520 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.