Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Ark. App. 198 - Lee v. State

27 Ark. App. 198 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Coulter v. State (1991), Easter v. Endell (1994)

8 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

31019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gardner v. State · Caton v. State · Kitchen v. State · Hamblin v. State · Sweatt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t restricts] application of the subsection in the conspiracy context to the situation where the consummated offense was the sole object of the conspiracy. If the defendant conspired to commit a continuing series of offenses, he may be convicted of both the conspiracy and a completed offense committed pursuant to the conspiracy. For example, the person who agrees with others to engage in the continuing sale and distribution of drugs may be convicted of both conspiracy and a completed drug sale.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) He agrees with another person or other persons: (A) That one (1) or more of them will engage in conduct that constitutes that offense; or (B) That he will aid in the planning or commission of that criminal offense; and (2) He or another person with whom he conspires does any overt act in pursuance of the conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.