Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 ARKAPP 242 - Huls v. State

Huls v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2022

11 state decisions

7019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Iron Shell · United States v. Renville · Berry v. State · Rowe v. State · Campbell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statements of identity seldom are made to promote effective treatment; the patient has no sincere desire to frankly account for fault because it is generally irrelevant to an anticipated course of treatment. Additionally, physicians rarely have any reason to rely on statements of identity in treating or diagnosing a patient. The statements are simply irrelevant in the calculus of devising a program of effective treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensation, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t has been held that when a motion in limine is overruled, no further objection is needed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.