In Re Ralph’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 69 Cal. 2d 906 - People v. Delles (1968), 39 Cal. 2d 41 - In Re Levi (1952)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re Herrera · People v. Ralph · People v. Flannelly · People v. Sourisseau · People v. Sloper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[A] court may commit to the authority any person convicted of a public offense who comes within subdivisions (a), (b), and (c), or subdivisions (a), (b), and (d), below: “(a) Is found to be less than 21 years of age at the time of apprehension. “(b) Is not sentenced to death, imprisonment for life, imprisonment for 90 days or less, or the payment of a fine, or after having been directed to pay a fine, defaults in the payment thereof, and is subject to imprisonment for more than 90 days under the judgment. “(c) Is not granted probation. “(d) Was granted probation and probation is revoked and terminated.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.