Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Conn. Super. Ct. 110 - Cunningham v. Parsons

27 Conn. Super. Ct. 110 - Cunningham v. Parsons’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Houck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny person aggrieved by any order, denial or decree of a court of probate in any matter, unless otherwise CT Page 2164 specially provided by law, may appeal therefrom to the superior court for the judicial district in which such court of probate is held.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.