Van Winkle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 1988 · most notably James Clark Distilling Company v. Western Maryland Railway Company (1917), 24 Del. Ch. 318 - Federal United Corp. v. Havender (1940)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gibbons v. Ogden · Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Brown v. Maryland · Robbins v. Taxing District of Shelby Co Tennessee · Leisy v. Hardin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An act divesting intoxicating liquors of their interstate character in certain cases,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. . R. R.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.