Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 F.1d 183 - Turner v. Shackman

Turner v. Shackman’s Empirical Analysis

27 F. 183 · 1886

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
January 1999
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1999

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

20188618901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fisk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In any case where it is necessary, in order to prevent a failure or delay of justice, any of the courts of the United States may grant a dedimus po-testatem to take depositions according to common usage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an effort to see what the defendant will testify to before he is put upon the witness stand in presence of the jury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.