Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 F.1d 204 - Hoe v. Knap

Hoe v. Knap’s Empirical Analysis

27 F. 204 · 1886

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
March 1945
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1945

5 federal appellate ·

501886189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mahn v. Harwood · Miller v. Brass Co. · Fay v. Cordesman · Horace Silsby Washburn Race Abel Downs Henry Herrion and Charles Thompson v. Elisha Foote · Wollensak v. Reiher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is bound either to use the patent himself or allow others to use it on reasonable or equitable terms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.