Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 F.1d 625 - Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.

Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

27 F. 625 · 1886

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
5
states following
April 1994
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 1994 · most notably Southern Pac Co v. Bogert (1919), 1 Cal. 3d 93 - Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co. (1969)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

70188618901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Ludeling · Clearwater v. Meredith · Gardner v. . Ogden · Brewer v. Proprietors of the Boston Theatre · Hoyle v. Plattsburgh & Montreal Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The minority stockholders are therefore entitled to demand their fair share in the transaction, and to be placed upon terms of equality with the majority. It may be that the property of the old company was not worth more than the sum fixed by the appraisers, estimating its value with a view of the winding up of the corporation; but for several months the property had been used by the defendants in a joint venture with the other property of the new corporation, and its value, at the time of the sale, should be estimated at what the property was worth as then situated. This results from the rule of equity which entitles those whose property has been misapplied by an agent or fiduciary to follow it into any form in which it has been converted, and impress it with a trust whenever its identity can be traced, or, at their election, to recover the value of the property in any form into which it has been transmuted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.