Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 F.2d 362 - In re Gannon

In re Gannon’s Empirical Analysis

27 F.2d 362 · 1928

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
March 2017
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2017

7 federal appellate · 6 district ·

701928193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wititaker Wright v. William Henkel · In re Mitchell · In re Chow Goo Pooi · In re Carrier · United States v. Yee Yet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The ‘judicial power’ is conferred by the Constitution upon the courts of the United States. The framers of the Constitution were familiar with common-law concepts and the words and phrases employed by common-law lawyers. The words chosen are ‘courts’ and ‘judicial power’. Whatever else may be said of the jurisdictional authority (in the power sense) of the judiciary, the meaning of the words and phrases used must be sought for in the literature of what we call the common law. Courts cannot function without the use of process, and any tribunal which has judicial powers can enforce attendance by holding the party to bail.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[sjhould the prisoner default, he will not only forfeit the penal sum of his bond, but will inflict upon himself a punishment many times heavier than any which would follow conviction for the offense with which he is charged, for he must thereafter elude the vigilance of the officers of each and both of two governments whose resources are practically unlimited. Against the small risk of default there is the injustice of imposing imprisonment in advance of a hearing which must be delayed for some time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.