Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 F.3d 1016 - United States v. Saenz-Forero

United States v. Saenz-Forero’s Empirical Analysis

27 F.3d 1016 · 1994

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

26 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably United States v. Calverley (1994), United States v. Cabrera-Sosa (1996)

26 federal appellate ·

270199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1543 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Olano · Taylor v. United States · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Weaver v. Graham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the defendant previously was deported after a conviction for an aggravated felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.