United States v. Bashara’s Empirical Analysis
27 F.3d 1174 · 1994
Citation profile
69 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 189 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2021 · most notably United States v. Vonn (2002), United States of America v. Juan Martinez (2002)
69 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1966 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Fussell v. Price · Mmahat v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. · Nagac v. Derwinski · Johnson v. Derwinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 189 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the amount of time that elapsed between the plea and the motion to withdraw it; (2) the presence (or absence) of a valid reason for the failure to move for withdrawal earlier in the proceedings; (3) whether the defendant has asserted or maintained his innocence; (4) the circumstances underlying the entry of the guilty plea; (5) the defendant’s nature and background; (6) the degree to which the defendant has had prior experience with the criminal justice system; and (7) potential prejudice to the government if the motion to withdraw is granted.”
52 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may permit a withdrawal of [a] plea upon a showing by the defendant of any fair and just reason.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ny variance from the procedures required by this rule which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.