Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 F.3d 1432 - No. 91-55718

No. 91-55718’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
6
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

15 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc. (1999), Lauren Wallis v. Mary Spencer

15 district · 9 state decisions

5701994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · City of Canton v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because questions of reasonableness are not well-suited to precise legal determination, the propriety of a particular use of force is generally an issue for the jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n officer is not entitled to qualified immunity on the grounds that the law is not clearly established every time a novel method is used to inflict injury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “in light of the legal rules that were clearly established at the time it was taken.” Chew v. Gates, 27 F.3d 1432, 1446 (9th Cir.1994) (citation and internal quotations omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.