Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 F.3d 194 - Schuck v. Frank

Schuck v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis

27 F.3d 194 · 1994

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
December 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2019

11 federal appellate ·

120199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703

Relies on MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp. · Lee v. Georgia · Foster v. Barilow · Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Because of an] agency’s inability to pursue an appeal from its own later decision... when a district court directs an agency to proceed under a certain legal standard, the agency has no choice but to conduct its proceedings and to render its decision pursuant to that standard. Unless another party appeals the decision, the correctness of the district court’s legal ruling will never be reviewed by the court of appeals, notwithstanding the agency’s conviction that the ruling is erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e review the district court's decision de novo, applying the appropriate standard of review to the agency's decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.