Turkish v. Kasenetz’s Empirical Analysis
27 F.3d 23 · 1994
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Cohen v. Koenig (1994), Harsco Corporation v. Segui Mhc Dkm-Mlp & II Lp (1996)
10 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on United Families of America v. Kendrick · Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight · United Families of America v. Kendrick · International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local 37 v. Boyd · Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plaintiffs do not claim that they relied on defendant's oral representations; rather, they claim that they relied on written representations in the contract itself.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“have had full and complete access to all books, documents, records, litigation files and other sources of information affecting all litigations[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“parties cannot use contractual limitation of liability clauses to shield themselves from liability for their own fraudulent conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.