Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 F.3d 314 - Lamotte v. Roundy's, Inc.

Lamotte v. Roundy's, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

27 F.3d 314 · 1994

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Snapper, Inc. v. Redan (1999), Hurley v. Motor Coach Industries, Inc. (2000)

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

150199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1912

Relies on Shell Oil Company · Miranti v. Lee · Hurt v. Dow Chemical Co. · Abbs v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall be removable only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Plaintiff argues that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court’s order was not reduced to a separate judgment as required by Fed. R.Civ.P. 58. It is clear, however, from the district court’s opinion that the district judge intended his order to be a final disposition of the issue. That is all that is required to give this court jurisdiction— the requirement of Rule 58 is not jurisdictional.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An order remanding the case may require payment of just costs and any actual expenses, including attorney fees, incurred as a result of the removal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.