Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

27 F.3d 562

Docket No. 93-2454.

Boatwright III v. Jefferson Ji

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 24, 1994. Decided June 8, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 1994

18 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-2-3-OBD)

George F. Boatwright, III, appellant pro se.

Patrick John Frawley, Bouknight, Nicholson, Davis, Frawley & Anderson, Lexington, S.C.; Charles Elford Carpenter, Jr., Deborah Harrison Sheffield, Michael A. Pulliam, Sr., Richardson, Plowden, Grier & Howser, Columbia, S.C., for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Boatwright v. Jefferson, No. CA-93-2-3-OBD (D.S.C. Oct. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Appellant's motion for a stay of proceedings in this Court is denied

/27/f3d/562 · .json · Public domain