Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 F.3d 723 - United States v. Guyon

United States v. Guyon’s Empirical Analysis

27 F.3d 723 · 1994

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably United States v. Frankhauser (1996), United States of America v. Nasser Ntege Sebaggala (2001)

18 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Diaz v. United States · Kahn v. Grant · In re Martin-Trigona · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fled at the eleventh hour, in an apparent attempt to manipulate trial process in the exact manner that [Rule] 43(b) is designed to prevent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “not show unequivocally that [defendant] voluntarily absented himself from the proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any error the court made in failing to make explicit findings ... was harmless”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.