Modeski v. Summit Retail Solutions, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on United States v. Gonzales · Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke · Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp. · United States v. Tavares · Clements v. Serco, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is appropriate only if 'there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.