Silva v. Garland’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1511 · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 3 · 26 U.S.C. § 7212 · 42 U.S.C. § 7413 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Williams v. Taylor · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · United States v. Mead Corp. · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he ordinary meaning of the phrase 'relating to' is 'a broad one . . . .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.