Seafarers Welfare Plan v. Philip Morris’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 403 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Brunswick Corporation v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat Inc · Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters · Jenkins v. McKeithen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nlike the various suits now pending brought by state attorneys general or other governmental entities, the [plaintiffs] are not the entities which actually paid the increased medical costs from their own assets. Rather, ... "plaintiffs are merely handling the payments with money provided by others, and have no genuine stake in the matter."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Complaint* ¶ 96; see also Complaint ¶ 56. This factual scenario is different from that which was before the Seafarers court: [U]nlike the various suits now pending brought by state attorneys general or other governmental entities, the [plaintiffs] are not the entities which actually paid the increased medical costs from their own assets. Rather, ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to determine whether, and the extent to which, any of the Funds' participants had other health problems which may have exacerbated the costs of health care for that smoker”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.