¶1St. Clair was indicted for operating an automobile, on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquors. The evidence authorized his conviction. The two special assignments of error, upon the admission of evidence, are not such as would require a new trial. For no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
27 Ga. App. 44
St. Clair v. State
Decided May 11, 1921
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1921-05-11
<p>Indictment for misdemeanor; from city court of Macon — Judge Gunn. February 4, 1921.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1958
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1921-05-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →