¶1The motion for a new trial in this case does not complain of any error of law, but is based upon the general grounds only. Under one view of the testimony, the verdict rendered for the plaintiff can be sustained, and the judgment overruling the motion for new-trial must therefore be Affirmed.
27 Ga. App. 821
Render v. Dixon
Decided December 14, 1921
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1921-12-14
<p>Complaint; from city court of LaGrange — Judge Duke Davis. May 2, 1921.</p>
Decided 1921-12-14