Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 ILL 237 - Vasconcellos v. Ferraria

Vasconcellos v. Ferraria’s Empirical Analysis

1862

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
March 1974
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1974

5 state decisions

20186218701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The evidence in the record as it now appears, seems to establish this fact, and if so, the action of the minority was irregular and unwarranted, and by it they acquired no rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.