Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 Ill. App. 3d 117 - People v. Mitchell

27 Ill. App. 3d 117 - People v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2001 · most notably 112 Ill. App. 3d 764 - People v. Gallardo (1983), 126 Ill. 2d 424 - People v. Salazar (1988)

30 state decisions

1401975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · The People v. Gambony · 7 Ill. App. 3d 1029 - People v. Kucala · 103 Ill. App. 2d 377 - People v. Bolden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““However, you may consider a witness’s earlier inconsistent statement as evidence without this limitation when the statement was made under oath at a trial. or the statement narrates, describes, or explains an event or condition the witness had personal knowledge of; and [a] the statement was written or signed by the witness. or [b] the witness acknowledged under oath that he made the statement. or [c] the statement was accurately recorded by a tape recorder, videotape, recording, or a similar electronic means of sound recording. It is for you to determine what weight should be given to that statement. In determining the weight to be given to an earlier statement, you should consider all of the circumstances under which it was made.” IPI Criminal 4th No. 311.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Evidence that on some former occasion a witness made a statement inconsistent with his testimony in this case, may be considered by you in deciding the weight to be given to the testimony of that witness.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.