Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 INDAPP 302 - Kissel v. Lewis

Kissel v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
April 1954
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1954

15 state decisions

50190119101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burkett v. Holman · Thistlethwaite v. State · Taylor v. Moffatt · Jaseph v. Schnepper · Harris v. United States Savings Fund & Investment Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the case at bar the contempt complained of was not a contempt of the special judge, nor of any regular judge, but of the Hamilton Circuit Court by whose authority the writ of injunction was issued. ... If appellant did any act in violation of the injunction it was an offense against the circuit court and not the special judge, and if such act be a contempt it is a contempt of the court and not the special judge. The circuit court at the trial did act through the special judge, but when the special judge rendered the final decree he had exercised the jurisdiction he was called upon to entertain. If jurisdiction is again to be put into exercise it must be done by the court through the then regular acting judge or by some one legally authorized to act as judge. See, Kirk v. Milwaukee, etc., Co., 26 Fed. 501 ; Williamson’s case, 26 Pa. St. 9, 67 Am. Dec. 374 ; State v. McKinnon, 8 Ore. 487 ; Hapalje on Contempts, §§ 8, 13, Hawes, Jurisdiction, §221; Taylor v. Moffat, 2 Blackf, 305.” (p. 306.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . shall have power to hear and determine said cause until the same is finally disposed of, or change of venue thereof in proper cases.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.