Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 INDAPP 582 - Strunk v. Pritchett

Strunk v. Pritchett’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
6
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 1992

22 state decisions

801901191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Indianapolis v. Kingsbury · Dantzer v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. · Taylor v. City of Fort Wayne · Forsythe v. City of Hammond · Wolfe v. Town of Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The obstruction complained of not only materially interferes with appellee’s access to her real estate but it takes it entirely away, so far as the way in question is concerned. It cannot be said that she can reach the front of her lot by the street, and therefore suffers no injury. If she is entitled to the use of the alley, the existence of a different way at another place cannot deprive her thereof. The special injury necessary to sustain the action is therefore made out.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.