Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 27 INDAPP 79 - Hornbrook v. Hetzel

Hornbrook v. Hetzel’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
August 1941
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1941

6 state decisions

2019011910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Delivery was necessary to its execution. The statute requires that a chattel mortgage must be filed for record in the office of the recorder of the proper county within ten days after its execution. As there was no execution until its delivery, the mortgage was recorded in time.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.