NEGUSIE’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 113 · 18 U.S.C. § 1365 (Federal Anti-Tampering Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2119 · 18 U.S.C. § 2442 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · United States v. Bailey · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.