ORTEGA-LOPEZ’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 49 · 7 U.S.C. § 2156 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services · Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton · United States v. Stevens · Clark Field Office Director Seattle Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al. v. Martinez · Kucana v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.