CORDERO-GARCIA’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 3 · 18 U.S.C. § 4 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital · National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there would be little reason for a person to try to prevent or dissuade a victim or witness from reporting the crime to appropriate authorities unless there was an investigation in progress[,] or one was reasonably foreseeable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Silva v. Garland“an investigation or proceeding would necessarily be either ongoing, pending, or reasonably foreseeable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Silva v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.