¶1The Court (Freedman, J., writing) held, after a further hearing of counsel on the settlement of the order, that in view of the complicated state of the accounts between the parties, the defendant should have a further hearing upon a new trial, and that the order to be entered should provide for the unconditional reversal of the judgment upon the facts .as well as the law, and for a new trial, in accordance with the principles laid down in the opinion reported in 58 N. Y. Superior Court Reports, 385.
27 Jones & S. 560
Griggs v. Day
The Superior Court of New York City
Decided January 5, 1891
The Superior Court of New York City · decided 1891-01-05
<p>On the settlement of the order to he entered on the decision in this case, reported in 58 N- T. Superior Court Reports, page 885.</p>
Decided 1891-01-05