¶1The questions involved were as to the admissibility of parol testimony to add to or vary the terms of a written contract, and also as to the construction of the written contract. The Court affirmed the judgment and order with costs. (Freedman, J., writing, Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Ingraham, J., concurring,) and referring to a former decision in the case reported in 57 N. Y. Super. Ct. Rep. 474.
27 Jones & S. 574
Pirsson v. Arkenburgh
The Superior Court of New York City
Decided January 5, 1891
The Superior Court of New York City · decided 1891-01-05
<p>Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon a verdict directed at the trial, and from order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.</p>
Decided 1891-01-05