¶1The question involved was as‘ to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain plaintiff’s cause of action. The Court (per- Curiam) held, that as the trial judge had superior opportunities for the determination of serious doubt upon conflicting evidence some deference should be accorded to-it, and that such deference sufficed to impel an affirmance of the judgment, and affirmed the judgment, with costs. -
27 Jones & S. 582
Hart v. Wilder
The Superior Court of New York City
Decided March 9, 1891
The Superior Court of New York City · decided 1891-03-09
<p>Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint oa the -merits entered upon the findings and decision of a; judge on a trial at special term before the court withouha jury.</p>
Decided 1891-03-09