27 Kan. App. 2d 152 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Chamberlain v. State · State v. Gardner · Winter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We believe deference should be shown to the observations of the trial judge who was in a much more advantageous position than this court to appreciate the tactics of counsel. Moreover, the decisions now being questioned by [the defendant] are clearly within the province of the defense counsel after consultation with his client. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Smith, 27 Kan. App. 2d 152, 154, 999 P.2d 280 (2000).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.