27 Kan. App. 2d 41 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullins Coal Co. v. Director · State v. Ruebke · 20 Cal. 4th 47 - People v. Lee · State v. Valdez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[W]here a defendant is charged with second-degree intentional murder and convicted of voluntary manslaughter based on sudden quarrel or heat of passion, the conviction may stand even absent evidence of sudden quarrel or heat of passion, as long as the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of second-degree intentional murder.” 27 Kan. App. 2d at 46 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““where a defendant is charged with murder and is convicted of the lesser included offense of manslaughter, the defendant’s conviction will stand notwithstanding the fact that there was no evidence to support the jury’s finding of provocation, as long as the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of the greater crime of murder.” 27 Kan. App. 2d at 45 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Abu-Fakher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.