27 Kan. App. 2d 956 - State v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · State v. Sanders · Board of County Commissioners v. McGraw Fertilizer Service, Inc. · State v. Gardner · State v. Cox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is nothing in the record to indicate that Boyd ever objected to the appearance of his trial counsel. Boyd appeared with his attorney at the motions hearing, the jury trial, the motion for new trial, and at sentencing. He had ample opportunity to object to the presence of his attorney. Also, an issue not presented to the trial court, as is the case here, will not be considered for tire first time on appeal.” 27 Kan. App. 2d at 965 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.