Clair Circuit. This was an action of trespass quare clausum, brought by Haner against Platt before a justice of the peace and certi-fled to the circuit upon notice that the title to land would;, come in question. On .the trial the question appeared to be-, one of disputed boundaries, and parol evidence was admitted against objection, of the description of premises contained in the United States patent of the lands in question.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1900
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
¶1held that parol evidence of the contents of a United States patent is inadmissible; for, if the patent itself is lost or not accessible, the proof by exemplification from the general land office is equivalent in degree and should be obtained.
¶2Judgment reversed, with costs, and a new trial awarded.